This section\u00a0addresses these ethical questions:<\/p>\n
News organizations differ widely on racial, ethnic, gender and religious references. They are a constant subject of discussion — discussion that is most effective when diverse voices are present in the newsroom and sought from outside.<\/p>\n
Some news organizations avoid identifying a person or group by race, ethnicity, gender or religion unless it\u2019s relevant to the story. Others feel these identifiers are as much of a fact as a person\u2019s name, and reporters should not be squeamish about mentioning it. A publication that seek to promote or defend a particular group will naturally include identifiers some other publications might not.<\/p>\n
Often when a person becomes the first of his or her race, gender, ethnicity or religion to attain some achievement or milestone, the reference makes sense. For example, most reporters would agree that when Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, it was relevant to say he was the country\u2019s first black president.<\/p>\n
Two cautions on this score:<\/p>\n
The achievement usually has to be something where the identifier is newsworthy. If a woman becomes the first Hispanic to make a college swimming team, that may not strike most readers as worth noting — unless Hispanic contenders have been discriminated against in the past or have put special effort into joining the team.<\/p>\n
The positioning of the racial identification within the story may require thought. When Michael Bloomberg became mayor of New York, the fact he was Jewish was not a headline element to many U.S. readers. His religion could safely be relegated to biographical material lower in the story. To readers in some other countries, the fact that the city\u2019s mayor was a Jew was very important. (One news agency referred to him in its lead paragraph as a \u201cJewish billionaire.\u201d)<\/p>\n
Racial,ethnic and religious references go naturally into some stories. When members of a particular group demonstrate over an issue important to them as a group, their identity is a natural part of the story. On the other hand, if you would not point out that a CEO is male, you likely shouldn\u2019t emphasize that a CEO is female.<\/p>\n
When police issue detailed descriptions of suspects being sought, race is usually included, and news organizations report it as a public service. It\u2019s important for the description to be detailed, however, so it\u2019s useful rather than just a racial stereotype. \u201cA black man in a T-shirt\u201d doesn\u2019t help the public in identifying the person being sought. In addition, media outlets should be careful to report race consistently in such situations and consider the whole of their reporting on victims and alleged perpetrators to ensure coverage is not tilted because of implicit or explicit bias<\/a>.<\/p>\n But what happens when people of a certain race or ethnicity riot or commit a series of crimes, but the situation isn\u2019t overtly over any issue related to race? Do we point out that the rioters and criminals are all from a certain group or should we refer to them simply as \u201cyouths\u201d or \u201cneighborhood residents\u201d?<\/p>\n There are two major schools of thought:<\/p>\n If those involved do not introduce a racial element — by, for instance, shouting slogans or attacking members of another racial group — it\u2019s not for journalists to introduce it. People may riot not specifically because of a racial grievance but because they\u2019re poor or oppressed, which racial minorities may be. It\u2019s a distraction from their economic plight for the press to try to make a racial issue of it.<\/p>\n OR<\/p>\n It would be completely obvious to any observer present at the time that those involved in the riot or crimes are of a certain race, and readers should not be deprived of information that anyone who was there could see. Trying to cover up the group involved is a form of political correctness that obscures what\u2019s truly going on. The fundamental problem may be poverty or oppression, but the fact that certain minorities are the victims — and are striking back — must not be concealed.<\/p>\n Gender references also matter in news coverage. With gender transition, most news organizations now refer to transgender people by the gender they express publicly, regardless of their gender at birth. There\u2019s more disparity regarding people who identify themselves as being a different gender than their birth but have not completed a physical transition to a new gender.<\/p>\n Other people shun a binary male-or-female identification, seeing themselves as a combination of the two sexes or non-gender. Some publications follow precisely what the person wishes, including using such pronouns as \u201cze\u201d or \u201chir\u201d instead of \u201che\u201d or \u201cshe.\u201d Others try to avoid such pronouns, saying they do not want to confuse their readers, and they write in such a way as to avoid the need for pronouns at all. However, it always makes sense to take the space to convey clearly how a person identifies, if it is relevant to the story.<\/p>\n Some style guides default to males in pronoun usage, such as, \u201cA student knows when he has worked hard enough to earn a good grade.\u201d Yet this gendered expression can easily be rendered moot by making the usage plural, such as \u201cStudents know when they have worked hard enough to earn good grades.\u201d<\/p>\n Ed. note: We updated this section to remove an example that mentioned an individual’s deadname, while discussing how news organizations referred to them in coverage. <\/em><\/p>\n For the most up-to-date guidance on ensuring accurate and sensitive coverage of trans communities, we encourage journalists to refer to the Trans Journalists Association\u2019s Style Guide<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n Most style guides now advise avoiding the term \u201chomosexual\u201d unless in clinical uses. Gay (for men or women) or lesbian (for women) are preferred. Sexual orientation should not be included in a story unless it is specifically relevant to the issue or event being covered. \u201cSexual orientation\u201d is preferred in all contexts to \u201csexual preference\u201d or \u201cliving a gay lifestyle.\u201d For gay couples who have legally married, \u201chusband\u201d and \u201cwife\u201d are appropriate unless eschewed by the subject.<\/p>\n This main author of this section\u00a0is Thomas Kent<\/a>.<\/p>\n Additional Resources<\/strong> This section\u00a0addresses these ethical questions: When should a person or group be identified by race, ethnicity, gender or religion? What is the most appropriate language to use for transgender people and people who do not identify as male or female? What are the most appropriate references for sexual orientation? News organizations differ widely on racial, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":82,"featured_media":0,"parent":25,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-223","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nGender language<\/h3>\n
Sexual orientation references<\/h3>\n
\nGLAAD, Media Reference Guide<\/a>, August 2014
\nNeiman Reports, Covering Race, Class and Poverty in the New Gilded Age<\/a>, March 15, 2001
\nNPR, Four Lessons from the Media\u2019s Conflicted Coverage of Race<\/a>, Dec. 6, 2014
\nRTNDA, Guidelines for Racial Identification<\/a>, 2015
\nTrans Journalists Association, Style Guide<\/a>, 2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"