ONA Student Newsroom
  • Data reveal differences in return to in-person schooling
    • June 26, 2021
  • How three news start-ups approached innovation in 2020
    • June 22, 2021
  • Sports journalists, from left, Matt Musil of KHOW TV, Emily Giangreco of KVUE TV, and John Affleck, the Knight Chair for Sports Journalism at Penn State University.
    Virtual group interviews are changing sports coverage
    • June 22, 2021
  • In their memory: Pandemic offers opportunities to transform digital obits
    • June 21, 2021
  • COVID-19 vaccine incentives: do they work?
    • June 21, 2021
  • Home
  • ONA25 Conference
  • Online Journalism Awards
  • Member Log In
ONA Student Newsroom
  • About
  • Previous Coverage
    • ONA23: Philadelphia
    • ONA22: Los Angeles
    • ONA21: On Demand
    • ONA19: New Orleans
    • ONA18: Austin
    • ONA17: Washington
    • ONA16: Denver
    • ONA15: Los Angeles
    • ONA14: Chicago
    • ONA13: Atlanta
    • ONA12: San Francisco
  • Industry

Improving Your Digital Hygiene

  • Madeline Ross
  • October 19, 2013
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
Hygiene
Illustration by Graham Clark/ONA Newsroom
No digital communication is completely secure, but some technologies are safer than others. That was one of the takeaways from Journalism in the Age of Surveillance, a panel exploring how journalists can protect themselves and their sources in a new era of digital surveillance.

Janine Gibson, editor in chief of the Guardian U.S., recounted the challenges of publishing national security stories like the Edward Snowden leaks.  “These stories are very expensive,” she said. “You need a lot of lawyers, a lot of plane tickets and you need a lot of care and attention.”

The law regarding source protection and surveillance is currently in flux, said panelist Nabiha Syed, founder of Drone-U and a media lawyer.

“In the interim, technological solutions are key,” Syed said. She calls the adoption of secure technological habits a form of “digital hygiene” for journalists. However, she cautions that technology can only provide so much protection and that journalists can still be subpoenaed. “If you come into the crosshairs of a prosecution there’s not a lot you can do.”

For journalists who want to protect their sources, encryption technologies are critical. “Right now what we do on the internet and say on the phone is like an open book,” said panel member Micah Lee, a technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Although NSA devotes resources to cracking these codes, encryption tools like Tor and PGP have proven remarkably strong, Lee said.

Good habits regarding digital security can also help sources feel more secure. Lee recounted how Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who wrote the Snowden stories and who has since left the Guardian, almost lost Snowden as a source due to technophobia. Snowden wanted to use PGP to communicate and Greenwald kept putting off implementing the program, deterred by how difficult it was to use.

Over time surveillance technologies trickle down from the national to the state and local levels, added Syed. Local police departments can use drones to surveil protests and read license plate numbers. Encryption can protect sensitive sources inside a City Council, as well as those within federal agencies.

Right now, many secure tools aren’t as user-friendly as programs like Skype and Gmail, which the government can surveil. “We need to invest in these,” said Lee. “They’re good for democracy.”

A BEGINNER’S TOOLKIT:

Tor – A free software that masks online traffic and protects anonymity.

PGP – Though not the most user-friendly application, PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) is an industry standard for encrypted communication.

TrueCrypt – Free, open-source disk encryption that protects your files.

CCleaner, BleachBit, FileShredder – Each of these programs wipes clean your hard drive and deletes all temporary files.

CryptoCat – Private, encrypted chat that feels like a standard instant messaging service.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ON SECURITY:

Committee to Protect Journalists security guide:

Global Investigative Journalists Network

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Madeline Ross

Previous Article
  • Conference
  • Industry

Staying safe in the age of Assange

  • Beena Raghavendran and Graham Clark
  • October 19, 2013
Read More
Next Article
  • Uncategorized

After ONA social media binge: Let things percolate

  • Beth Cortez-Neavel
  • October 19, 2013
Read More
1 comment
  1. Pingback: ONA 13′ Day 3 sessions tackle online ethics in the ‘age of surveillance’ | Mobile Mizzou Journalism

Comments are closed.

Special thanks to our Sponsors

Microsoft logo

Tegna Foundation

Canva logo

Top Articles
  • 1
    Snapshots of Excellence: the 2023 Online Journalism Awards
    • August 27, 2023
  • 2
    Online Journalism Awards honor stellar work
    • August 26, 2023
  • 3
    ONA aims to boost attendance for this year’s award ceremony
    • August 26, 2023
  • 4
    DEI in the Newsroom: Meeting People Where They Are
    • August 26, 2023
  • 5
    Early morning alarm alerts hotel residents
    • August 26, 2023

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

ONA Student Newsroom
Daily conference coverage from ONA's student newsroom

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.