The journalism industry is in crisis mode amid layoffs, audience decline and mistrust. But seemingly lost in all the discussion is the application of design thinking in the newsroom.<\/p>\n
Journalism is focused on rebuilding its relationship with its audience. But that\u2019s the trouble with \u201cnowists,\u201d as Amy Webb, founder of the\u00a0Future Today Institute, likes to put it; they\u2019re only worried about the problems and solutions of today.<\/p>\n
The more immediate the problem, the graver the focus on spending all energy and resources to fix it. And yet, the industry hasn\u2019t fully identified a standardized solution to a \u2018now\u2019 problem: the differentiation of news, opinion, analysis and sponsored content.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is an easy UI\/UX fix, yes, but journalism is still recovering from its current problems,\u201d said Hearken’s Jennifer Brandel in an interview at the ONA Conference this week. “Newsrooms are shrinking and there\u2019s no time to invest in long-term solutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
A former journalist, Brandel is an advocate for a design-first and\u00a0an audience-first approach to content problems. Her Medium piece titled \u201cDesign Thinking and Journalism Go Together<\/a>\u201d resonates with many in the industry like Heather Chaplin, who authored the Columbia Journalism Review guide to \u2018Journalism and Design<\/a>\u2019.<\/p>\n There are a lot of things from the design thinking toolkit that’s beneficial to journalism, said Matt Thompson of The Atlantic and co-founder of Spark Camp. “Design processes are actually very journalistic. It has a strong reporting process of engaging with an audience and getting feedback.”<\/p>\n Whether UI\/UX can solve the distinguishing problem of news vs. opinion is a great problem to have, he added. “Users are releasing a lot of signals on how to weigh and evaluate information and media organizations should be leading the charge and help them navigate through facts and assertions based on evidence or hypothesis or guesses about the world \u2014 that’s real need users have.”<\/p>\n One of the key takeaways from the CJR guide is that innovation in journalism should be centered on humans and not technology. Webb in her Society for News Design keynote talk echoed a similar thought. \u201cYou have to put your audience first \u2014 not your audience\u2019s devices.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cMost newsrooms make decisions that are content-driven as opposed to an audience-first and design-driven approach,\u201d said Angela Wong, a product manager of enterprise software at The Washington Post.<\/p>\n Wong said The Post has made serious redesign decisions, which are already underway, to bring UI\/UX to the fore and make it easier for readers to distinguish between news, opinion and sponsored content.<\/p>\n \u201cAlthough the solution to this problem is not necessarily for newsrooms to start hiring UI\/UX designers,” she said. “Journalists have been using words like \u2018opinion\u2019 and \u2018analysis\u2019 in the headline to help make the distinction and sometimes that\u2019s enough.”<\/p>\n For comparatively smaller non-profit organizations, such as the Texas Tribune, a redesign process is more organic to their distribution model. Rodney Gibbs, chief product officer at the Texas Tribune, explained how news and opinion have lived on separate websites for years.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re a non-partisan publication so it\u2019s important readers understood the difference between news and opinion,\u201d he said. \u201cBut now, the digital world is changing and we\u2019re slowly bringing our opinion pieces from \u2018Trib Talk\u2019 on to the main website and using design to separate them.\u201d<\/p>\n But what happens when content leaves the main website and gets distributed on different channels?<\/p>\n Journalism is definitely heavily reliant on third-party distribution channels and thus limited by their design and process, Brandel said.<\/p>\n \u201cFor example, Facebook is about Facebook and not about anyone else or about news. They need to maximize shareholder value and not necessarily help the ecosystem… I am sure they talk about it though and think of using design to fix problems in journalism but will they actually do something about it? That\u2019s debatable.\u201d<\/p>\n The problem is deeper though than the specificity of this issue.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is a lack of understanding design for what it is meant for \u2014 this belief that design is just about making something look pretty is the problem,\u201d Wong said. \u201cThe biggest compliment you can lend a designer is not that their design is beautiful but that their design is well-thought and useful.\u201d<\/p>\n The industry needs a mind-shift to its approach to journalism, Chaplin said in her interview:<\/a>\u00a0\u201cIf you\u2019re an urban planner, for example, you would never just build something without understanding the needs of the people who are going to live there. So they work with that community to bring to the surface the community\u2019s needs and desires, which is going to lead to the most successful housing complex you can build. I think there is something very similar going on with journalism now.\u201d<\/p>\n This approach is especially important now that immersive multimedia storytelling is slowly growing and is heavily dependent on technology and design to communicate ideas effectively.<\/p>\n